Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  All-out campaign regarding revision of FT50 journal list

    Posted 12-14-2020 08:08

    Dear Colleagues,

    We are all receiving emails requesting our support for the inclusion of specific journals on the revised FT50 journal list. Being a resident of Washington, DC, I could not help to notice that this is turning into a familiar all-out lobbying campaign. Editors and professional organizations requesting support for their journals are most certainly NOT to blame-this is the reality we live in. But, frankly, it is sad to see that so much is at stake by a list created by journalists whose interest are not necessarily scientific advancement or impact/application of research.

    The following articles published in the February 2020 issue of Academy of Management Perspectives offer suggestions on how we can do things better:

    I look forward to a vigorous and informative debate on these important issues!

    All the best,

    --Herman.



    ------------------------------
    Herman Aguinis, Ph.D.
    President Elect, Academy of Management
    Avram Tucker Distinguished Scholar & Department of Management Chair
    The George Washington University School of Business
    Washington, DC
    http://hermanaguinis.com/
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: All-out campaign regarding revision of FT50 journal list

    Posted 12-15-2020 07:36

    Dear Herman, colleagues,

     

    All good points well made, and of course there is an open debate in print, as you say. Sadly the key issue here, as I experience it and as I hear about it from colleagues, is now what we write. More important, the language of rankings like the FT50 has become part of our everyday usage in talking about ourselves and each other's work; and this reductive exclusionary language is used too often to inform decisions on people's careers, with material consequences for individuals and our field. It might be utopian, but I suspect that if we committed, either individually or institutionally, to stop using the languages of ranking, then the ranking would become less influential, and there would be less lobbying...

     

    Kind regards, scott

     

    Scott Taylor (Dr) - Business School Director of Admissions

    Reader in Leadership & Organization Studies, Department of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

    s.taylor@bham.ac.uk (+44) 0121 414 6703

     

    Section editor Journal of Business Ethics – Leadership: Philosophical Perspectives and Qualitative Analysis

    Textbook co-editor Leadership: Contemporary Critical Perspectives, 2nd edition

    Recent articles in The Conversation